Last modified: 2021-07-02
Abstract
This study aim is to do analyze about the student consumption behaviour especially for the students of study program Education Technology wich is caused by the E-commerce. The research methods is qualitative research methods with using questionnaire and an interview to collect the data and information from the 15 informants. The result of this research is indicate that all the informants are having e-commerce in their smartphone wich is accessed intensively, and all the informants are ever have the consumption behavior because they have bought without need. That behavior are caused because of there are so many discount, promotion and because of affected by ads during the social media.
Keywords: Student Consumptive Behaviour; E-commerce
Keywords
References
F, K. Ge. (1967). 済無No Title No Title No Title. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952., 12–27.
Heryana, A., & Unggul, U. E. (2018). Informan dan Pemilihan Informan pada Penelitian Kualitatif. Universitas Esa Unggul, 25(December).
K. Yudha Wirakusuma. 30 Juni 2020. Perkembangan Teknologi Membuat Pergeseran Gaya Hidup. Medcom.id : https://m.medcom.id/amp/akW5YDLN-perkembangan-teknologi-membuat-pergeseran-gaya-hidup
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2020). Surat Edaran Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 35952/MPK.A/HK/2020. Mendikbud RI, 1–2. https://www.kemdikbud.go.id
Lailatul Rachmawati, A. (2019). Analisis Pengaruh E-commerce Terhadap Perilaku Konsumtif Mahasiswa (Studi Kasus Pda Mahasiswa Di Prodi Manajemen Universitas Tidar). Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Manajemen, 1(1). https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penelitian_kualitatif
Marina, D. (2020). konsumerisme di Era digital. TarFormedia, 99.
Pariwang, S. (2017). Modernitas Dan Perilaku Konsumtif Mahasiswa Unismuh Makassar. Doctoral Disertation, 53(9), 1689–1699.
Sazali, H., & Rozi, F. (2020). Belanja Online dan Jebakan Budaya Hidup Digital pada Masyarakat Milenial. JURNAL SIMBOLIKA: Research and Learning in Communication Study, 6(2), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.31289/simbollika.v6i2.3556